— Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) November 14, 2020
Attorney Lin Wood has filed a lawsuit against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, claiming an agreement Raffensperger entered into with Hillary Clinton attorney Marc Elias about Georgia absentee ballots in March is unconstitutional.
I filed a lawsuit today in federal court in Atlanta to establish that the March 6, 2020 Consent Agreement by the GA Secretary of State rendered UNLAWFUL the 11/3 GA general election.
I am right under established law. https://t.co/3FBMWlPDmC
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) November 13, 2020
From The Gateway Pundit:
On March 6, 2020 the Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, signed off on a secret legal agreement with the Democratic Party of Georgia, the Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee, and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee to alter absentee ballot procedures in Georgia. The Democrats’ attorney for this secret deal was Marc Elias from Perkins Coie, the consigliere of Hillary Clinton who has been busy managing other secretive Democratic election operations all across the country.
That agreement transformed absentee ballot procedures in Georgia. It made it much more difficult (nearly impossible) for an absentee ballot to be rejected based on unverifiable information.
The original procedures state:
The changed procedures state:
From the Pundit:
Wood argues that the right to change election processes lies with the legislature and not the Secretary of State or the Judiciary.
Wood argues in his lawsuit that given that Raffensperger had no legal authority to sign this legal document, Wood is asking of the Court, in his Prayer For Relief, the following:
(a) That, as a result of Defendants’ violations of the United States Constitution and violations of other federal and state election laws, this Court should enter an order, declaration, and/or injunction that prohibits Defendants from certifying the results of the 2020 general election in Georgia on a statewide basis;
(b) Alternatively, that, as a result of Defendants’ violations of the United States Constitution and violations of other federal and state election laws, this Court should enter an order, declaration, and/or injunction prohibiting Defendants from certifying the results of the General Elections which include the tabulation of defective absentee ballots, regardless of whether said ballots were cured;
(c) Alternatively, that, as a result of Defendants’ violations of the United States Constitution and violations of other federal and state election laws, this Court should enter an order, declaration, and/or injunction that the results of the 2020 general election in Georgia are defective as a result of the above-described constitutional violations, and that Defendants are required to cure said deficiencies in a manner described in the Litigation Settlement; and
(d) Any and other such further relief that this Court or the Finder of Fact deems equitable and just.
The recount currently undertaken in Georgia has been called a “scam” and a “sham” because an audit is not being performed to determine the eligibility of the votes. They are merely being re-tabulated.
Read Wood’s legal complaint in its entirety here.