What do the Demon Rats have on Judge Roberts?
To blackmail him with! Must be Epstein!!! pic.twitter.com/LnpW8jhVGH— TRUMP ALWAYS WINS!!! (@DavidYeshua4) November 26, 2020
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was intimately involved with writing up FISA warrants that led to the surveillance of the 2016 Donald Trump campaign. That allegation comes from a whistleblower who worked closely with former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein at that time.
“They wanted to remove [President Trump] any way possible. They had worked with Roberts prior to this, prior to the actual election, and Roberts had actually helped them write up the FISA warrants with Pete Strock [sic], and…would write them up…and Roberts would send them off to be signed by whoever judge he controlled,” he says.
The whistleblower identified by alias Ryan Dark White in the interview transcript, is active on social media under the handle @Johnheretohelp.
John also implicates Roberts as being a participant in entrapment schemes set up to blackmail prominent officials using the network of alleged child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
“And Rod and Roberts, Chief Justice Roberts – a lot of the younger people involved, the ones that were brought as favors, were supplied by Jeffrey Epstein’s channels, through his channels, his people,” John says.
“We were able to get FISA warrants because Chief Justice Roberts had vice court and helped prepare them, but it was also – Epstein was an intelligence asset of some type to various agencies around the world. They used his information. They exploited it for their own good.”
“So, when he was here, or his people were here, it was easy enough to justify a FISA warrant on them. You know, they would enact a warrant, surveil everything, document it. But they would not help and they would not save the child…it was more important for them to have the leverage on everything.”
John also says Epstein helped facilitate the adoption of Roberts’ two small children around the year 2000. Roberts was busy with that process in the aftermath of the 2000 presidential campaign, when he was helping the George W. Bush campaign craft a legal strategy for winning the Supreme Court case that would ultimately make Bush president. Roberts was a junior lawyer on the legal team at the time.
Roberts “spent a few days in Florida advising lawyers [for Bush] on their legal strategy,” but “he did not play a central role,” because “at the time, Roberts was preoccupied with the adoption of his son,” a Newsweek report from that time reads.
Roberts, would eventually adopt a little boy and a little girl. Epstein, according to John, would help with the adoption of both.
“He did help him with his adopted children,” John says. “From what was said…and what was…discussed openly…the children are not genetically brother and sister, but they’re raised that way. So that’s more valuable to them.”
“One if not both were originally from Wales, but they were in the Epstein channels and were easily removed from their version of foster care to Ireland, which has much more open adoption type records. He facilitated this for Roberts so he could adopt them both at the same time. There was a little gap, but it was just paperwork. And Epstein had done that for him. So, they met, they worked together, and he was doing favors at some point,” John added.
The exact nature of the “work” and “favors” Roberts has performed have become a subject of speculation, especially as it relates to his tenure on the U.S. Supreme Court and rulings he has made.
In 2012, when the first Obamacare case reached the High Court, Roberts was reportedly going to vote to strike the law down. He reportedly suddenly “changed his mind” while writing his opinion and decided to vote to uphold the law instead.
Many called the logic behind his argument “tortured.” He ruled the law could be upheld if its individual mandate was seen to be a tax and not a penalty. This despite President Obama himself saying it was “absolutely not a tax increase” in 2009.
In December Texas filed a petition with the Supreme Court asking it to hear an election fraud case. Legal watchers believed because of the merits of the case, and the weighty issues to be decided by it, the Court would have no choice but to take it up.
The Supreme Court declined to hear the case, however, finding Texas “lacked standing.” This despite Texas bringing the suit under the exact same legal argument Roberts helped craft for George W. Bush in his post-election case some 20 years prior – Equal Protection under the U.S. Constitution.
Behavior that seems to fit a pattern consistent with one explained by John when describing compromised individuals.
“So, the FBI is all about getting influence. Now, they’re dirty, so they control it. It’s not like they control it every day. They don’t tell them ‘Do this, this, this and this,’ it’s just when they need the big one they can call it in.”
John Roberts on the Epstein Flight log. Now, why does Chief John Roberts despise POTUS so much? Hmmmm. pic.twitter.com/Ui2wSw81Ym
— Daniel Lee (@dnajlion7) December 18, 2020
John Roberts denies having flown on Epstein’s plane.
In 2016 a Georgia Gwinnett College student named Chike Uzuegbunam, an Evangelical Christian, was ordered by a campus police officer to stop giving a speech about religion. Despite obtaining the necessary permit from school officials and speaking at a campus designated “free expression zone,” Uzuegbunam was threatened with disciplinary action if he did not comply. He did.
Uzuegbunam, along with another student, sued the school for violating their First Amendment rights to free speech. The case went all the way up the U.S. Supreme Court where it was decided this week.
Eight of the nine justices, including all of the liberal justices, ruled in favor of Uzuegbunam, calling the violation of Uzuegbunam’s rights “undisputed.” The sole dissenting vote was that of Chief Justice John Roberts.
There’s no need to use the word ‘alleged’ when stating that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were themselves pederasts, that they trafficked hundreds of children to be sexually abused for blackmail, and that they were protected by the “intelligence” agencies of several countries–including the FBI, the CIA, Mossad and MI6.
Ryan D. White may have been born John McGreavy. He says at the beginning that Rod Rosenstein wrote to the colleges and universities from which he had graduated and told them that White was impersonating John McGreavy, that McGreavy was deceased, and he therefore advised them to destroy his academic records.
On the topic of the chief justice of the supreme court, White states that he is a homosexual, and that he used to loan out his children to be sexually abused for the purpose of blackmail. He and his wife would be the fourth powerful Washington couple that is not sexually compatible. John and Jane Sullivan Roberts, Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton, Mike and Karen Pence, and Barack and Michelle Obama (the homosexual of the Clinton couple is Hillary). The CIA-approved globalist president of Mexico, before Lopez Obrador won for the third time and was not cheated out of his victory in 2018, was a married homosexual named Enrique Peña Nieto. French President Emmanuel Macron is another married homosexual. Are we starting to see a pattern?